SO, Over the next few weeks, there are a number of very
interesting A&N things I'm going to be doing in different parts...
Pune, Hyderabad and Jaipur. Do come by if you are around; the details
follow:
1) Dec 30 in Pune; Release by Deepak Dalal
of my new book 'Islands in Flux - the Andaman and Nicobar story'
followed by an illustrated presentation on the islands. Happens at
Pagdandi, Baner, Saturday, December 30, 11 am. Also a small photo
exhibition on the islands at Pagdandi. Event details: https://www.facebook.com/events/155050761799769/
Pankaj
Sekhsaria on how his disappointment as an activist attempting to
protect the ancient rainforests and Jarawa tribals of the Andaman
islands, led him to write a novel, ‘The Last Wave—An Island Novel’, and
tell the same story differently
When
Pankaj Sekhsaria first travelled to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands as a
student, he had little idea of how enduring his engagement with the
islands would turn out to be. Over the last two and a half decades, he
has been an environmental activist, a journalist, researcher,
photographer and author—and in each of these roles, he has tried to
unravel and communicate the complex issues that define the existence of
the islands, its people and environment.
“What is the meta
question to be asked about the Andaman and Nicobar Islands?” asks
Sekhsaria rhetorically. “Broadly speaking, any system we are part of
consists of three elements—the socio-cultural-political, the ecological
and the geological framework. On the islands, all these three are always
in flux, and we need to find a language to articulate and account for
how they influence each other. All development planning needs to take
this constant change into account.”
As a member of the Kalpavriksh
Environment Action Group, Sekhsaria was part of the team of three
non-government organizations whose petition before the Supreme Court
resulted in orders for the closure of the Andaman Trunk Road (ATR) in
2002. This ambitious road on the Andaman island links Port Blair in the
south to Diglipur in the north. It also cuts across the reserved
rainforests that are home to the reclusive Jarawa tribals, exposing both
the ancient rainforest and the Jarawas to exploitation. It was a
vector, both metaphorical and literal, that brought in a number of
undesirable and uncontrollable influences, on the one hand, and took
away valuable resources like timber on the other.
The victory in
the Supreme Court remained short-lived. Some of the orders, including
those for the closure of the ATR, have never been implemented by the
administration. The indigenous tribes that go back over 30,000 years
continue to be vulnerable to the state and to ideas of development and
mainstreaming that have not had any great successful precedence,
certainly not in the case of these islands.
After years of trying to influence change as an activist and journalist, Sekhsaria published a novel, The Last Wave—An Island Novel, in 2014.
“The
fiction writing came from the disappointment of the activist,” shares
Sekhsaria. “The question became—can the same story be told differently?
“As
a journalist or activist, there is a particular form in which the story
must be told. There is a limited reach. Can a different genre of
writing tell the same story to the same people and make some headway?”
Sekhsaria
recounts the events that led to his book. There was the failure of the
administration to implement the Supreme Court order, followed by the
devastation suffered after a tsunami in December 2004. Around that time,
Sekhsaria was also reading Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide, a novel set in the vulnerable archipelago of islands in the Bay of Bengal.
“It
was a little like a tubelight switching on in my head. Perhaps the
story of the islands can also be told in the same way. When you are
involved with any work for a long time, you understand that it is
multilayered. As an activist, you end up portraying certain institutions
as problematic. But, in reality, things are more ambiguous. The space
in the grey is where everything lies. There is no one villain.
“What
fiction allows you to do is explore motivations and actions in a
nuanced way. Good fiction demands that. There are certain voices that
are not heard in a certain context, and I wanted to express their points
of view and perspective.”
In a chapter in The Last Wave,
Sekhsaria writes about the connect, or lack of it, between the ancient
community that faces inevitable annihilation and those whose actions are
leading up to it. “The other original islanders, the Onge and
the Great Andamanese, who had cohabited these forests with the Jarawas,
had all but gone. The Jarawa were now being dragged down the same path.
There was the evidence and the weight of history—the Jarawa would be
pushed down the road to annihilation—that was the word David had used in
their first meeting. What do the annihilated feel? That was not the
question Harish wanted to ask. What does the annihilator feel? How would
he, himself, feel when the Jarawa were no more? Not because he wanted
them to be vanquished, but because he could do nothing about their slide
into oblivion. The world he belonged to did not want to annihilate the
Jarawa, but it did not seem to know better.”
Sekhsaria recounts a recent exchange with a friend from Port Blair. “Hamara wajood kya hai,” asks the friend. “What is our relevance in the larger world?”
Like
all islands, this archipelago has its own allure in the imagination of
India’s mainland population. Besides the attraction of its beaches,
forests and sea, there is the historical connection to the freedom
movement and the Cellular Jail. The islands remain a strategic outpost
for the defence services.
Where
do the diverse people of the islands fit within this framework? Will
they continue to be on the fringes of the national consciousness, their
aspirations and conflicts forever marginalized?
Over the years,
says Sekhsaria, he began to question what the core conflict between
various people’s interests really was. “I realized that somewhere we are
dealing with a battle of ideas and ideology and knowledge and knowledge
systems. There is a certain hierarchy of knowledge creation. How can we
say the tribals’ knowledge is less than the scientists’? They
understand differently.”
“Has there been a difference in the way the book has been received in mainland India and on the islands?” I ask Sekhsaria.
“For
many of them, it’s as if the story of the islands has now been told.
There are friends who say that reading this book makes many people
change their perspective of their own islands. It is an amazing thing to
hear and extremely humbling at the same time.
“So what the
activist was not able to communicate, in a way the fiction writer could
do,” says Sekhsaria. “As an activist, your positions are pretty clear.
You broadly take a stand and draw a border between right and wrong.
Either the road is closed or the road is open. Either something is a
violation or it is not a violation. An able chronicler, on the other
hand, tells you all the stories.”
Sekhsaria explains, for
instance, that the ATR is a central element in the novel. The people who
will be affected negatively by the closure of the road have a strong
voice in the book, explaining why the road should not be closed. Why it
is not fair on them.
“It makes me wonder if it is possible that we
become sympathetic to the other side when we feel that our own point of
view has been understood fairly?”
As
Sekhsaria articulates the eternal conflict between outsiders and
insiders, the push for development and the pull of conservation, the
island story begins to sound like a microcosm of the wider world.
Conflicting interests, a hierarchy of power that seems immovable, a
rapidly deteriorating environment, and entire societies teetering on the
brink of annihilation.
“Why does it happen the way it does? Is it
completely unavoidable? Are we all, in some sense, prisoners of our own
context? We feel that there is agency but we are also caught up in our
own biases,” Sekhsaria says. “With time, you realize that as individuals
we are all as compromised as anybody else is.”
After touring with
his fiction and non-fiction books, Sekhsaria has also designed a
travelling exhibition of photographs from the island. He experimented
with printing images on a large canvas of silk fabric and suspending
them, so they moved in the air as light came through the prints. These
photo installations are part of The Story of Space 2017, a
science-meets-art festival in Panaji, on till 19 November.
“I
wanted to create another space of engagement between mainland people and
the islands,” says Sekhsaria. “The same words and photographs that I
had used in court petitions or journalistic articles were now available
in a new form—seeking to create a different experience and reflect the
idea of flux and fragility. It is the same, yet it is new.”
Just
like the islands, which are also always in flux, responding
simultaneously to destruction and renewal at the hands of nature. Natasha Badhwar is a film-maker, media trainer and author of the book My Daughters’ Mum. She tweets at @natashabadhwar
This book tells us why we need to talk about the Andaman and Nicobar islands urgently
The little-known history of the islands is accessible and engrossing in campaigner Pankaj Sekhsaria’s ‘Islands in Flux’.
For over two decades, researcher and campaigner Pankaj
Sekhsaria has been writing about the state of environmental, social and
political affairs in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Islands in Flux: The Andaman and Nicobar Story brings
together the bulk of his reportage since 2000 on key issues affecting
the islands. Though this isn’t (as the author himself notes) a
comprehensive history of the islands in that time frame, it is a solid
beginning in understanding the unique conditions of an area whose
complexities are largely ignored by the mainland.
Sekhsaria is
quick to point out that the islands are misunderstood and
underrepresented in the Indian media. He refers to the “marginalisation
of the islands in the nation’s consciousness.” The original communities
of the islands are the Great Andamanese, the Onge, the Jarawa, and the
Sentinelese. In the early years of India’s independence, the government
devised a plan to colonise the islands. As a part of this plan,
thousands of settlers from the mainland were incentivised with land and
timber to settle in the island. The timber-rich forests were opened up
to exploitation. In the last century, which has seen unprecedented
population growth at the islands, approximately a 10th of the forested
land has been wiped out.
Island in danger
The
islands are home to unique flora and fauna which have been endangered
by aggressive developmental policies. In one of several examples, the
logging is noted to have threatened the populations of the saltwater
crocodile and the endemic wild pig. We learn that the islands are an
important nesting spot for turtles, including the giant leatherback
turtle which is critically endangered, which is threatened by sand
mining and a growing population of dogs.
The colonisation of the
islands by mainlanders has also had the effect of drastically
endangering and outnumbering the indigenous, tribal population.
Sekhsaria notes in one example:
In
the early 1960s, the Onge were the sole inhabitants of Little Andaman.
Today, for each Onge, there are at least 120 outsiders, and this
imbalance is rapidly increasing.
Of the first three
tribes mentioned above, the Jarawa tribe survived the onslaught of
forced development the longest. Sekhsaria narrates how their “hostility
and self-maintained isolation in the impenetrable rainforests” insulated
them from the changing times. But the construction of the Andaman Trunk
Road in the heart of their territory forced them to slowly abandon
their self-contained way of life.
One of the other themes explored in Islands in Flux
is the role of naming in colonisation. He points out that a singular
theory is popular on the mainland about the origin of the name Andaman –
that it comes from the Hindu figure of Hanuman – even though historical
accounts document various theories. He criticises the calls to rename
the islands after freedom fighters as dismissive of the identity and
history of the local tribes. The islands had already been re-christened
by the British. Sekhsaria says: “If the real and complete history of the
islands is ever written, the British would be no more than a page and
India could only be a paragraph.”
Sekhsaria takes us through the
complex journey of the islands in the last two decades. In response to a
distressing report on the state of the islands’ forests by a
court-appointed commission, the Supreme Court ruled that sand-mining
operations had to be phased out and the Andaman Trunk Road closed.
Outsiders versus insiders
But
as we read on, we discover that economic and political interests led to
a wilful non-compliance of these orders. Throughout the book, the
author highlights how the tribes’ interests are not protected, their
land and people exploited and how they are not consulted in policy
decisions.
He narrates the conflicts over land between the
settlers and the tribes. In particular, the story of the Jarawa people
is told in animated detail as small groups of them begin to unexpectedly
emerge from the territory they had earlier fiercely kept themselves to.
No one was allowed to enter their land, and they did not venture out
either until the late 90s. This tribe has dwindled to a meagre 250
individuals. As Sekhsaria puts it, for them it “is literally a struggle
for survival and against extinction.”
The little-known history of
the islands is accessible and engrossing in Sekhsaria’s sympathetic,
painstaking prose. Sekhsaria is hopeful that if change arrives, even at
this late juncture, it will save the tribes from extinction and the
islands from complete decimation. This is an important book for its
lessons on the environment, on India’s uneasy and problematic
relationship with some of its territories and on the implications of
forcing development and modernisation on indigenous communities.
The book is available in stores and via amazon: http://tinyurl.com/y9pnz9mlIslands in Flux: The Andaman and Nicobar Story, Pankaj Sekhsaria, Harper Collins.
Dear Friends,
Pls see below for the list of contents and the editorial from the new
issue of the Protected Area Update (Vol. XXIII, No. 5, October 2017 (No.
129). Click here to download the pdf of the issue
To receive the full issue as a pdf or as a print copy via
the post, please write to me at psekhsaria@gmail.com
I would also like to take this opportunity to request for your financial
support for the PA Update. Of the annual budget of about Rs. 7 lakhs
we've managed to raise only about half at the moment. All donations and
contributions, big and small, are welcome. Pls do consider helping us
out pls write to me at the above mentioned email id for any further
details that you might need.
Many thanks
Pankaj Sekhsaria
Editor, Protected Area Update
C/o Kalpavriksh
---
PROTECTED AREA UPDATE
News and Information from protected areas in India and South Asia
Vol. XXIII, No. 5
October 2017 (No. 129)
LIST OF CONTENTS
EDITORIAL
Systemic injuries, band-aid solutions
NEWS FROM INDIAN STATES
ASSAM
- SC asks for explanation on permission for oil and gas drilling beneath
Dibru-Saikhowa NP
- Eviction drive to remove encroachers from Amchang WLS
GOA
- Goa excluded from NGT’s Pune bench; activists condemn the move
GUJARAT
- Number of lions in Gir touches 650
HIMACHAL PRADESH
- Biodiversity management committees set up in 366 gram panchayats
JHARKHAND
- Government approves diversion of 1000 ha land from Palamau TR
- Palamau TR brings captive sambars to increase tigers’ prey base
KARNATAKA
- Kali TR to lose 75% of its ESZ; state bows to public pressure
- Policy for private conservancies for wildlife conservation adjoining PAs
- Over 3000 families displaced from Nagarahole NP to be rehabilitated;
NGO express concern over implementation of plan
- Stop to illegal electrification work in Bhimgad WLS
- New management plan for otter conservation in Tungabhadra
KERALA
- Institute for Western Ghats wildlife research
- Survey records over 120 species of amphibians and reptiles in Periyar TR
- 58 tigers in Periyar and Parambikulam TRs
- 400+ families relocated from Wayanad WLS
- Two new species of earthworm discovered in Western Ghats
MAHARASHTRA
- NHAI to build only one wildlife underpass near Tipeshwar WLS
- High-level committee to decide about tiger translocation
ODISHA
- Advance payment for human kills by wildlife
RAJASTHAN
- NBWL denotifies over 400 ha of forest from buffer of Ranthambhore TR
for mining
TAMIL NADU
- 60 Irular families evicted from buffer zone of Mudumalai TR
TELANGANA
- NBWL diverts tiger corridor for irrigation project; asks for 16
eco-bridges to avoid fragmentation
UTTAR PRADESH
- Build toilets to curb human-tiger conflict in Pilibhit: Chief Minister
NATIONAL NEWS FROM INDIA
- Tiger cell at WII gets three years extention
- Over 27,000 wild elephants in India; highest number of 6,049 in Karnataka
- Over 15% of species in India threatened: IUCN
- Dr. Mahesh Sharma takes charge as Minister of State in MoEFCC
- Centre seeks Supreme Court’s approval for cheetah re-introduction
- One person killed a day in wildlife attacks in India
- 12 important mangroves forests of the country identified
- Exotic species invading PAs: Minister
- Meeting held to discuss, curb wildlife trafficking using postal services
- SC asks Centre to consider suggestions on safe corridors for wild animals
- Eurasian otter presence confirmed in the trans-Himalayas
- Finance Act dilutes the NGT Act says Jairam Ramesh; SC issues notice
to Centre
- Inclusion of Net Present Value of diverted forest in
cost-benefit-analysis mandatory; - - - NPV to be 10 and five times more
than normal for NP and WLS respectively
- NGT asks MoEFCC to prepare a policy for prevention of forest fires
- More than 700 projects awaiting environmental clearance: Minister
- SC questions Centre over reduction of ESZ by 100 times
SOUTH ASIA
Nepal/India
- 50 rhino calves swept away from Nepal to India; eight returned
IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS UPDATE
MANIPUR
- Call to decommission the Ithai dam
RAJASTHAN
- Openbill storks abandon nesting in Keoladeo NP because of water shortage
A DECADE AGO
PERSPECTIVE
Why I care about the KBR National Park?
--
EDITORIAL
'Systemic injuries, band-aid solutions'
Even a quick survey of the conservation scenario in the country today
makes one thing rather crystal clear – that the imperatives of
conservation cannot (will not!) be allowed to come in the way of
industrialization projects and economic growth. This, in fact, has
become the defining narrative, and PAs are more in the news for policy
that is constantly being diluted to make clearances and permissions
easier; for railway lines, roads and canals that will cut through
forests and other habitat; and for land in PAs (and elsewhere too) being
made available for mining, dams, and infrastructure projects.
We have in this issue of the PA Update, like we’ve always had in the
past, a number of such examples: of the National Green Tribunal (NGT)
being undermined by structural change, of land around tiger reserves
like Ranthambhore and Palamau being made available for mining and dam
projects and of linear intrusions being approved in PAs in Maharashtra
and Telangana.
There are two different kinds of narratives that seek to justify these
developments. The first and the more blatant one articulates explicitly
that PAs, environmental regulation and such concerns are impediments in
the ‘development’ of the country. The other is the more confused and
self-contradictory one. It pretends to be concerned even as it goes
about its job of undermining precisely these concerns.
If offers, in cities for example, to transplant full-grown trees because
roads have to be widened and growth in vehicle population cannot be
questioned; it claims to be concerned about climate change even as it
pushes the economy towards a larger emission load; and it allows for
linear intrusions like power lines, roads and canals to splice through
PAs and then offers underpasses and over bridges so that wild animals
can cross over. We have very little idea of how the underpasses and
bridges for animals will actually work, if they work at all, but caught
up in the belief that we can have the cake even as we eat it, we are
willing to go along with these solutions.
We are being enticed and dissuaded by band-aid solutions when the
injuries being inflicted are systemic and deep. The price to pay will
also be very high!
===
Protected Area Update
Vol. XXIII, No. 5, October 2017 (No. 129)
Editor: Pankaj Sekhsaria
Editorial Assistance: Reshma Jathar, Anuradha Arjunwadkar
Illustrations: Ashvini Menon, Mayuri Kerr, Shruti Kulkarni,
Madhuvanti Anantharajan & Peeyush Sekhsaria
Produced by The Documentation and Outreach Centre
KALPAVRIKSH
Apartment 5, Shri Dutta Krupa, 908 Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004,
Maharashtra, India.
Tel/Fax: 020 – 25654239
Email: psekhsaria@gmail.com
Website:
http://kalpavriksh.org/index.php/conservation-livelihoods1/protected-area-update
Publication of the PA Update has been supported by
Foundation for Ecological Security (FES) http://fes.org.in/
Duleep Matthai Nature Conservation Trust, C/o FES
Donations from a number of individual supporters
------
--
Pankaj Sekhsaria, PhD
Senior Project Scientist, DST-Centre for Policy Research, Dept of
Humanities and Social Science, IIT- Delhi
Author, 'Islands in Flux - the Andaman and Nicobar Story' (HarperCollins
India, March 2017) & 'The Last Wave - An Island Novel' (HarperCollins
India, 2014)
Also, member, Kalpavriksh Environment Action Group
---
facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pankaj.sekhsaria
twitter: https://twitter.com/pankajsekh
For the
longest time, the Andaman and Nicobar archipelago, rich with rare
endemic wildlife remained on my wish list, inaccessible due to expense
and distance. It was only in early 2005 that I made my way there to
report the aftermath of the tsunami. The visit was turbulent – the
island was reeling with the massive destruction unleashed, and a
profound sense of loss. My brief stay was an unsettling mix of the
exquisite and the tragic: my first, bewitching sight of the coral
wonderland, walking the rich, riotous — and diminishing — rainforests
that clothe the emerald islands, witnessing dead bodies being unearthed
from under flattened homes and trees even three weeks post the tsunami,
and the heartbreaking, haunting encounter with a once-proud people, the
Jarawas, running after our vehicle, arms outstretched for a packet of
biscuits. The cost of dignity, priced Rs 4.
The tsunami, I
gathered, was one among the many storms — none so pronounced — the
islands had been battered by, their violence gradual, but no less
virulent.
It
is this steady invasion of the island, of its people, cultures and
ecology, so that its original identity is subsumed that journalist and
researcher Pankaj Sekhsaria has meticulously chronicled over the past
two decades and brings together in the Islands of Flux. He calls it —
bluntly and boldly, a colonization. The exploitation of the islands was
started by the British who systematically logged the great forests for
timber, unmindful of the animals and plants they housed, and the tribes
that depended on it — an agenda followed with “clinical efficiency by a
modern, independent India.” After 200 years of tyranny by a colonial
power that fattened itself on the back of its people, land and
resources, India gained freedom only to itself emerge as a colonizer. In
the late 1960s, the Government of India had an official plan in place
to “colonise” the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
This is the subtext
that runs through the book, a collection of Sekhsaria’s articles,
published in different newspapers and magazines. The pieces give
insights into the islands — there are 572 in all, with only 36 being
inhabited — their environment, wildlife, indigenous people, the influx
of mainlanders, and their idea of development.
Massive
deforestation took away from the tribals their means of sustenance. The
consequent soil erosion killed live coral and marine life. The other
onslaught was from settlers from mainland India — they encroached on and
cleared the jungles, brought in disease, alcoholism, industry, and an
economy alien to the local cultures. They ridiculed the Onges, the Great
Andamanese and other tribal people — isolated for millennia — as
‘uncivilized’, making them outsiders in the land they belong to. Their
numbers dwindled, and were soon vastly outnumbered. From instance, from
being the sole inhabitants of Little Andaman, there are today over 120
outsiders for each Onge.
This exploitative vision has only
worsened with successive governments, who have given a thrust to ports,
industrial infrastructure and tourism, including inside sanctuaries and
tribal reserves. Coastal and environment norms are being tweaked to
accommodate these.
No contemporary record of the islands can be
complete without the tsunami, which shifted the very geography of the
islands. Sekhsaria delves on these wounds and suggests other
far-reaching consequences one of which is escalating military activity.
Owing to its strategic location — far from mainland India and close to
Myanmar, and Indonesia, the archipelago has always been of strategic
importance, serving as a launching pad and a look out post. Post
tsunami, there was a flurry of defence activity and proposals. The
Brahmos missile, test-fired on one of the remote islands, made news in
March 2008. Other controversial proposals include a missile-firing
testing system that would endanger the ground nesting of the endemic
Nicobar megapode in the Tillanchong Sanctuary and a RADAR station in the
only home of the Narcondam Hornbill on Narcondam Island.
The
problem in this vision of development, a view of the islands as a
military and economic colony is that it fails to consider the fragile
ecology and the vulnerable indigenous communities. “The islands has
always only existed on the margins of the consciousness of the nation.
Did the earthquake and tsunami further ratify the fringeness of the
fringe, allowing for experimentation, explosions and targeting in the
interests of the Centre?” asks Sekhsaria.
The writing is elegant,
the pen compassionate, the vision clear, even if the book is hampered by
the fact that it is a collection of reports, hence lacking flow, and
with a few overlaps across reports.
That apart, Islands of flux
is an important book, providing a unique document from a region that
rarely features in the mainstream media, and in dialogues in faraway
Delhi. Even more lacking is an understanding of its unique wildlife,
forests, people, culture and the intricate link between these, which the
author writes of with finesse. This book is particularly relevant as
the country sees mounting tensions from other such ‘colonies’ in the
hinterland, where farmers, fisherfolk and tribal people are up in arms
against the juggernaut of development: mines, ports, power plants,
industries that erode ecology that sustains them, and a way of life.
The writer tackles this complex, nuanced subject with sensitivity and an insight backed with his years on the ground.
I
hope that the book will bring the islands closer to the state that
rules it but fails to serve it, and to tourists who visit it, unseeing
and uncaring of their footprint. I know I need to visit again, to see
the island with eyes anew.
In his new book, Pankaj Sekhsaria continues his analysis on complex
issues that put the beautiful Andaman and Nicobar islands in a state of
flux
--
‘Islands in Flux – the Andaman and Nicobar Story’ (HarperCollins
India; ₹399) is a collection of writings by researcher Pankaj Sekhsaria
over two decades, many of them published in mainstream media including The Hindu.
While a collection of fictional works might be of nostalgic value or
help analyse the evolution of a writer’s style and thought processes
over time, this compilation aims to educate and inform readers of the
history, geology and ecology of the earthquake-prone islands.
Hyderabad-based
Pankaj Sekhsaria, who unveiled his book in the city recently, first
visited the islands in 1994-95 on a friend’s invitation. An avid
photographer with an interest in wildlife, environment and conservation,
he travelled extensively between the islands of the archipelago for two
months. Since then, he has gone back several times and chronicled the
changes and conflicts in the island.
When we begin to talk, he
puts things in perspective on the need for this compilation: “As a
researcher or an activist, you have a sense of the history of a place
and its issues and you see things coming back in circles. There is
enough information out there — be it on development, ecology or about
the indigenous people. But issues crop up and you feel the need to
respond and react, though it feels repetitive since you’ve already
written about it. In a sense, it feels like being on treadmill — running
in the same place,” he says.
A keen observer of events in the
islands, he observes how those in authority, irrespective of the
political party, announce development projects as though starting on a
clean slate, but oblivious to the ramifications. Seismic activity
In
the islands, Sekhsaria explains, geological activity is a crucial
factor. “The Andaman and Nicobar islands are among the most seismically
active zones in the world, with earthquakes occurring even twice a
month. The earthquake measuring 9.3 on the Richter scale that triggered
the tsunami of 2004 happened off the Sumatra coast, which is 100km off
the Nicobar, and caused huge damage. A decade later, new development
projects haven’t taken into account the geological, socio cultural and
ecological components of the islands. Indigenous people who’ve been
there for 30000 to 40000 years are part of the unique ecology. A
characteristic of the islands is the high endemism — plants, animals,
birds and butterflies not found anywhere else,” he points out.
Having highlighted various issues pertaining to the islands through his ‘Faultline’ column in The Hindu,
Sekhsaria hopes his writings will raise awareness. He feels the islands
need plans that understand its seismic activity and the inherent risks,
while also factoring in the presence of indigenous tribes and forest
areas that need to be conserved. By not having a deeper understanding of
the issues at hand, he feels projects might increase the “vulnerability
of both the tribals and around 400,000 settlers from mainland who live
modern lives like any of us.” Living in denial
To
cite an example, he talks about the union home minister’s (Rajnath
Singh) visit to the islands this summer. “A delegation of farmers from
Port Blair met him to request compensation for their lands that were
submerged following the tsunami of 2004. On another day, there was a
tourism delegation requesting relaxation of CRZ (Coastal Regulation
Zone). The 2004 tsunami raised some parts of Andamans by 4ft while
sinking parts of Nicobar by 15ft. If there are tourism-driven properties
closer to the coast, aren’t they also vulnerable? We have to
acknowledge the risks and think of a solution; we can’t live in denial.”
Over the years, Sekhsaria has interacted with people and
organisations working on environmental conservation and education in the
islands.
Writing or holding talks are his way of increasing the
dialogue. “The least I can do is talk or write so that there’s a counter
narrative,” he states.
Sekhsaria draws attention to how every now
and then, political parties toy with renaming some of the islands or
their landmarks. “The islands have a complex history — the first war of
independence, kalapani and colonisation. Some may argue in favour of
renaming the colonial-sounding names after Indian freedom fighters. But
the islands have a history longer than that of colonisation; there are
original names given by indigenous people,” he states.
As a
parting thought, he states that even if some of the writings in this
book have been more than a decade ago, it assumes more relevance today.
The author’s previous books on the islands: The Last Wave – an island novel (HarperCollins India; 2014) The Jarawa Tribal Reserve Dossier – Cultural and Biological Diversity in the Andaman Islands (UNESCO and Kalpavriksh; 2010)
The book ‘Islands In Flux’, released recently in the city which explores the story of Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Aasheesh Pittie and Pankaj Sekhsaria.
Photo: N Shiva Kumar Meru
Ornithologist Aasheesh Pittie launched the book ‘Islands In Flux’
written by Pankaj Sekhsaria, researcher and author, recently at
Goethe-Zentrum, Banjara Hills.
The book features the information,
insight, and perspective related to the environment, wildlife
conservation, development and the indigenous communities and
contemporary issues in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
It provides an important account that
is relevant both for the present and the future of these beautiful and
fragile Island but also very volatile Island chain.
Pankaj Sekhsaria said, “It is not new
for me to write about Islands and it this is my collection of writings
about Andaman and Nicobar Islands. These islands are far away from India
but they are part of it. The islands have various kind of animals,
birds and more.”
Pankaj Sekhsaria said that everybody
started talking about these Islands after the Tsunami in 2004. “Today
our oceans are filling up with a lot of plastic. Many scientists are
fearful that our oceans will have more plastic than fish in 2050,” added
Pankaj.
He informed that no government has
taken care of the tribal people of these Islands since independence. “No
one is concerned about the tribal people, who have been living there
for more than 40,000 years. In 1956, these Islands are declared for the
tribal, but no one is taking care of them,” he adds.
Pankaj hopes that his book will create awareness in people about these Islands.
One
of the most significant trends visible in wildlife conservation and
management today is the increased use of ‘technology’. Camera traps, for
instance, have provided new evidence of tiger presence in the Mhadei
Wildlife Sanctuary in Goa and of the Asiatic wildcat in Bandhavgarh,
Madhya Pradesh; radio collars have helped solve the mystery of tiger
deaths in Bandipur in Karnataka and Chandrapur district of Maharashtra;
and satellite telemetry promises to provide new insights into the
behaviour and movement patterns of the Great Indian Bustard in Gujarat,
which includes its journeys across the border to Pakistan. New software
and sophisticated surveillance technologies are being operationalised to
keep an eye on developments across large landscapes and the use of
contraceptives has been suggested to contain runaway populations of
animals ranging from the monkey in large parts of India to the elephant
in Africa.
Within easy reach
We may not be able
to escape such a technology-based framing, but is it possible that the
current set of technologies, like those mentioned earlier, are
profoundly different from those of the earlier era? And is the change
that we are seeing, therefore, a more fundamental one?
What these
innovations appear to do is increase our proximity to the subject of our
interest and of our investigation. Surveillance technologies are
bringing distant and topographically complex landscapes right into our
homes and offices so that they can be observed and monitored without
moving an inch. More individual wild animals are perhaps being caught
and handled today than has ever happened earlier. And then there are
various levels of physical intrusion that these sentient beings are
subjected to — be it a microchip in the tail, a radio collar around its
neck or a contraceptive injected into its body, not to mention the
sedation that most of these individuals are forced into to enable such
intrusions.
Technology has always allowed us deeper access into
and control over our environment; in many ways it has been key in the
human conquest over nature. And yet there are some things — a ferocious
large cat or a free flying bird or a deep-sea mammal — that had still
seemed out of reach. They were wild, defined as an animal ‘living or
growing in the natural environment; not domesticated or cultivated’.
They were wild and therefore inaccessible or inaccessible, therefore
wild. Technology is closing that gap and it is the very idea of the
‘wild’ and ‘wilderness’ that comes into focus in important public
initiatives such as conservation and protection of biodiversity. How
wild or natural, for instance, is an animal that cannot perform its
fundamental biological function of procreation because it has been
sterilised by human intervention? Is a tiger that has been sedated
multiple times and now carries a radio collar as ‘wild’ a tiger as one
that has never been photographed, sedated or collared? How wild is a
wilderness where everything has been mapped, where everything is known
and where all movement is tracked in real time?
Aesthetic and ethical issues
The
matter here is both aesthetic and ethical. The basic pleasures of
enjoying the wild are essentially technology mediated intrusions (think
binoculars and cameras) into the private lives of animals that the human
species does not allow in its own case. Aldo Leopold pointed out, for
instance, to the role of the automobile, and the dense construction of
roads to accommodate them, as central to the emergence of wilderness
areas in 19th century United States. Does the radio collar go only a
step further, or is there a fundamental shift here? One could argue that
this collar is a signifier of further human dominance and authority
over the wild animal if not complete control. A photograph of a collared
tiger is unlikely to win an award in a wildlife photography context
just as an encounter with a collared animal is unlikely to evoke the
same experience of thrill because the element of surprise will have been
removed. The issue is one that goes to the very heart of the notion of
the ‘wild’ and of ‘wilderness’, marking as it does a paradigm shift in
our relationship to and understanding of wildlife.
This is not an
esoteric matter because it has a direct bearing on the agenda of
conservation; it is the conservation of this ‘wild’ life that we are
talking about after all. If we agree that technologies and technological
interventions are bringing about fundamental changes in the identities
and essence of wild subjects, it follows that current ideologies and
methods of conservation will also have to change.
Are we willing
to characterise wilderness areas as glorified theme parks? Are attempts
at conservation then just routes to manage these slippery slopes? If
this is not an appropriate aesthetic or ethical stance, then how do we
think of the ubiquitous use of high technology to shape wilderness, and
to intrude into ‘wild’ bodies, even as they are used in the name of
protecting them?
Pankaj
Sekhsaria and Naveen Thayyil are researchers at the DST-Centre for
Policy Research, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,
IIT-Delhi. The views expressed are personal
Think
of anything you have had to drink today — a cola, fruit juice, cold
coffee or lassi — and it is likely that it was served with a straw. The
ubiquitous pink, white or blue plastic drinking straw has indeed become
an unlikely marker of the modern culinary culture. Now think of the
number of drinks served in a restaurant every day, the number of
restaurants in a city, and the number of cities, big and small, in the
world today, and one can only imagine the volume of plastic straws used
on a daily basis. The plastic straw is also emblematic of the ‘use and
throw’ culture.
And the ease with which we ask for a straw and
then dispose it underlines both the mindlessness and the magnitude of
our actions and their repercussions.
In Kerala 3.3 million plastic
straws are used every day. It is 500 million daily in the U.S.. So
billions of these straws, by implication, are thrown away around the
planet. A significant chunk finds it way to the oceans and not
surprisingly, plastic straws are consistently in the top 10 items
collected every year during efforts to clean up the coastline.
While
the single straw multiplied a billion times over might still only be a
fraction of the total production and consumption of plastic in today’s
world, it has become the inadvertent stimulus of a very significant
anti-plastic campaign that has gained rapid traction all over the world.
The
initiative against the plastic straw had started a little earlier, but
it was about two years ago that the campaign took off.
International outrage
The
specific catalyst was a 2015 video that showed a plastic straw jutting
out from the nostril of an olive ridley turtle in Costa Rica.
The
video that went viral on social media (more than 12 million people have
seen it so far) has a marine biologist trying to pull out the straw with
a plier, when blood starts to flow from animal’s nose. The rescuer
continues to struggle for nearly five minutes before being able to pull
out the nearly-four-inch-long straw, revealing how deep it had been
embedded inside the animal’s body. The video sparked international
outrage, giving wings to a movement to fight the menace of the plastic
straw.
Much has been achieved since then. The Plastic Pollution
Coalition (www.plasticpollutioncoalition.org) has estimated, for
instance, that nearly 1,800 institutions worldwide, including prominent
ones like Disney’s Animal Kingdom and the Smithsonian have banned
plastic straws or give them only on request.
Volunteers who clean
up beaches regularly are reporting fewer straws now than they did about a
year ago and there is a small boost to those who make reusable straws
from metal or bamboo.
The international movement has had its
impact in India as well with reports of initiatives coming in from
different parts of the country. Responding to the global online campaign
#refusethestraw, earlier this year, restaurants and bars in Mumbai
decided to stop giving their customers straws with their drinks or to
offer them paper straws.
The restaurant industry in Kerala too
made a similar decision to mark World Environment Day this June, and
responding to complaints from citizens, the Kozhikode Municipal
Corporation in the State too decided around the same time to ban plastic
straws. It is one situation where the individual appears to be in a
position to make a very significant difference.
Anthropocene marker
One
of the markers of the Anthropocene, scientists say the planet has now
entered, is plastic pollution (others include nuclear tests, concrete,
and domesticated chicken).
Not only is plastic being produced and
dumped in ever increasing quantities, it is unique in that it does not
decompose or decay. A paper published in the journal Science Advances
in July 2017 estimates that the world’s oceans now have nearly nine
billion metric tonnes of plastic with an additional 5 to 13 million
metric tonnes being added every year.
This being the case, it is
expected that oceans will have more plastic than fish by the year 2050.
It’s a problem of gigantic and timeless proportions and the humble
plastic straw might just have triggered the first fight in a battle that
will need to be sustained. The author researches issues at the intersection of environment, science, society, and technology.
Pankaj Sekhsaria has a long-standing association
with the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (ANI) as a member of the
environmental action group, Kalpavriksh. He is the author most recently
of ‘Islands in Flux – the Andaman and Nicobar Story’ (Harper Collins India 2017), a collection of his journalism based on the islands over the last two decades. His debut novel ‘The Last Wave’
(HarperCollins India, 2014) was also set in the Andaman Islands and he
is also co-editor of The Jarawas Reserve Dossier for UNESCO (2010).
He is also author of ‘The State of Wildlife in Northeast India 1996-2011: News and Information from the Protected Area Update’, published by Foundation for Ecological Security.
He recently finished his PhD thesis titled ‘Enculturing Innovation – Indian engagements with nanotechnology in the field of Science and Technology Studies (STS)’ from the Maastricht University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences.
He currently works as a Senior Project Scientist, DST-Centre for Policy Research, Dept of Humanities and Social Science at IIT- Delhi.
when did you first realized that you want to write?
My interest in writing began, interestingly, because of writing
letters. These were my early days of college and while I was not a
loner, I did not have a very large circle of friends. Those were also
the years I was learning about environmental issues and thinking about
things that as a teenager are full of questions and have no straight
forward answers. There were a couple of friends who lived in different
places and we would regularly exchange hand written letters. Remember,
this was the era of no email – even computers were hardly there. And I
would write really long letters – running into many pages. And they
would write back often saying they enjoyed reading what I wrote and the
way I wrote. Those responses, I think, sowed the seeds for me and that
is where I began thinking of writing more seriously. Being an author,
however, was never on my list of things to become. The writing
progressed then from letters to friends, to letters to newspapers, to
articles and photo-features and eventually, now, to books.
2. Where did you get information for your books?
Both my recent books on the islands – ‘The Last Wave’, which is my debut novel, and ‘Islands in Flux’
which is a collection of journalism have come after nearly two decades
of research, writing and photography in the islands. So, it is this body
of experience, research, traveling and reading that I have drawn upon
to put the two books together. In some senses, the books are a consolidation of nearly two decades of my work in the islands.
3. What do you do when you are not writing?
Research and writing is an integral part of what I do and I do end up
writing quite a bit. There is a newsletter on wildlife that I edit for
the environmental action group, called Kalpavriksh. I also write a monthly column on the environment for ‘The Hindu’
and besides that regularly put together articles and photo features for
other publications. My research work is at the intersection of the
environment and social sciences and there is a lot of writing to be done
there as well. So I do end up writing a lot. To answer your question
more specifically – I do read quite a bit, I like to travel too and I am
also a keen photographer. My photography has in fact, been an integral
part of my writing and research work.
4. How did the idea of ‘Islands in Flux’
come about? Was there a certain incident or experience that
led to this narrative? ‘Islands in Flux’ is a book that brings together my journalistic and research based writing about the Andaman and Nicobar islands
over the last two decades. The attempt is to bring together the wide
range of experiences, issues and challenges that constitute the islands,
the three main dimensions of which are the histories of the human
communities here, the ecological diversity and fragility of this unique
island chain and the constant geologic and tectonic activity that is
very much part of life here. These are subjects I have been writing
about since the mid 90s for a range of English publications in India and
I realized that there is a considerably vast terrain that these
articles have covered. In many contexts these writings continued to be
relevant today, even as the issues they deal with are very interesting.
So, Islands in Flux, is not one narrative; the idea was
precisely to show that there are multiple narratives and stories and all
of them are important and relevant in different ways. And this becomes
particularly important because of the specific vulnerabilities of the
islands – one of the issues that was raised, for instance, during the
Home Minister’s recent visit to the islands was related to compensation
for land and other losses suffered by people here during the cataclysmic
earthquake and tsunami of December 2004. A simultaneous demand was for
relaxation of Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) norms because these are
coming in the way of expanding tourism in the islands. I am not sure
about others, but I see very clear contradictions here and the fact that
policy planning continues to ignorant of these very specific contexts
and vulnerabilities of the islands. A recent proposal for the
development of the islands being pursued by the Niti Aayog has
proposed, among others, plans for port construction, an integrated
tourism complex, construction of a trans-shipment terminal and creation
of a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in areas that are ecologically fragile
and also legally protected in the name of the indigenous communities.
The scale of what is being proposed in the islands today is unmatched,
and its implications for the local people and the local ecology barely
understood.
In recent years it has also been frustrating for me to see that many
of these issues have been discussed in various fora including in my own
writings in the past and yet none of these are seen reflected in new
proposals, statements and policies being put forward by politicians,
ministers, and the administration. The whole discussion has to be
started from scratch – it’s like being on a treadmill for ever. And so,
this was one of the most important reasons for me to put ‘Islands in Flux’ together – to kind of move on from that treadmill and force others to do the same as well.
5.What has been the biggest challenge while penning this book?
The format of the book – of putting together old writings to make
them relevant for a contemporary context and reality – I think, is an
interesting one. It is not a new format at all and has its limitations,
but it also offers some striking possibilities. And the key question is
whether I’ve managed to do it right. That would depend on how the book
is received and what kinds of discussions and debates it generates. The
initial responses from readers have been very encouraging and
interesting. At least a couple of people have written in saying they
realized on finishing the book how unaware they were of the multiple
realities and challenges in the islands – that there is much more to the
islands than the cellular jail, pretty beaches, and sparkling beaches
that the tourism brochures show us. All of this is very much the reality
in the islands, but there is much much more and conveying this is the
challenge that ‘Islands in Flux’ seeks to take up.
6.Tell us about cover of your latest book and how it came from?
The book as you know is titled ‘Islands in Flux’
and the central idea for the cover was to focus on this idea of
‘change’ and ‘flux’. So what we ended up doing was to create a rather
serene and calm scene with the boatman, the water and a tinge of green
via the coconut. It in some senses, depicts the calm before a storm –
the idea is that the calmness and the serenity is only momentary and
change is just around the corner. And this has worked well, I think
because of the contrast between what this scene depicts and the title
where the letters that make up ‘flux’ themselves are struggling to find a
balance.
7.Are you writing new book? If yes. What is it about?
There are two books that I am working on at the moment. One is an
edited book that looks at wildlife in the state of Maharashtra and the
other is in what is broadly called the Social Studies of Science and
Technology. This is based on my recent PhD thesis that studied
nano-science and technology laboratories in India to understand life
inside the lab and to also understand what innovation means inside these
labs and for scientists and technologists who work at the nano scale
8. What advise would you give to aspiring writers?
Writing is hard work and the more we write the better we get. Every
single iteration of a piece of writing is better than its preceding
version. So one should never think that what I have now cannot get
better. It can and being at it all the time is very important.
The other thing I believe is useful if not important to be a good
writer is to read – to read to learn and get new ideas but to read, also
to see how other writes write, how they use the language, how they work
with ideas…
On
this International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, Pankaj
Sekhsaria discusses the ecology of the Andaman and Nicobar islands, and
his new book, Islands in Flux
by
Aadya Singh
Wednesday, 09 August, 2017
The
Andaman and Nicobar Islands are a microcosm of multitudes – not just
because of their unique location, ecology and biodiversity, but also
because of the variety of contexts within which they can be experienced
and studied. (But information and studies on the islands are sparse and
hard to find, so you might find this backgrounder useful for some cultural and historical context.)
As
a noted researcher, writer, activist, and photographer of the Andaman
and Nicobar islands, Pankaj Sekhsaria embodies the diversity of the
region in his own work. Sekhsaria has been chronicling the stories of
the Andaman and Nicobar Islands for over two decades now. With a sharp
understanding of the islands’ issues, ranging from the cultural to the
political to the economic, he has been instrumental in crafting both
intellectual discourse and active intervention pertinent to this
landscape. His recently released book, Islands in Flux – The Andaman and Nicobar Story, is a collection of his journalistic writings on the ANI over the past twenty years.
Islands in Flux
is a tapestry of events in the island story, organised by themes that
transcend timelines and continue to be relevant today. With their unique
location off the mainland and their interconnected threads of culture,
community, ecology, and geology, the Andaman and Nicobar islands defy
singular, linear narratives – they are truly islands in flux.
We
sat down to talk with him about his experiences from the union
territory that most of us on the mainland know shamefully little about.
What motivated you to put together a chronicle of the islands?
What
motivated me was the need for a consolidated account of the islands,
that could comprehensively cover a gamut of issues. I realised that
every few years, with every new person that comes into the
administration, we had to start from scratch. Despite so much
information out there in the public domain, it’s like these people were
saying things in complete ignorance of certain issues, without any
historical knowledge. So two years ago, I thought, why not make another
consolidated account [his first compilation was titled Troubled Island
and released in 2003] so that all the facts are in one place.
When
you compile such a large body of writing, certain themes begin to
emerge, and that’s how this book is organised. It offers a snapshot of
issues beyond the usual. The islands aren’t just about the tsunami, or
about the Jarawa. Even older stories have a new salience in today’s
context – those issues haven’t gone away. I have had readers telling me
that they weren’t even aware about some of these issues that plague the
islands.
What first brought you to the islands, and what has the journey been like so far?
I
grew up in Pune, and was pursuing a Bachelor’s degree in engineering.
By then, I was already interested in wildlife and writing. It was a
‘forced’ gap year that started it all. I had enrolled in a post-graduate
degree in journalism, but two months into the course, I found out that I
hadn’t cleared my Bachelor’s and couldn’t continue the journalism
course, so I had a lot of time on my hands. At the time, a very dear
friend of mine was based in Port Blair, working in the Navy. He invited
me to come over, and that’s how I showed up at the islands for the first
time, more than 20 years ago. I spent about two months there,
travelled, met people, and got to know about the issues at the
forefront. I came back to complete my graduation and then enrolled for a
masters in communication at Jamia [Millia Islamia University] in Delhi.
It was when I moved to Delhi that I got in touch with Kalpavriksh, which had been working in the islands for some time. And then I went back for a research project in 1998.
It was during this visit of yours that the Jarawa first came out in large numbers. Could you describe that experience?
Yes,
the first big interaction of the Jarawa was in early 1998 and I,
absolutely by chance, happened to be there at that moment in time. It
was the first time they’d come out in such large numbers, though we
didn’t know that at the time. I had a camera on me and took a lot of
pictures, which today serve as historical documentation of a historic
moment. It was particularly puzzling, given the fact that Jarawas have
long been hostile towards the settlers, to whom they have lost large
swathes of their forests. In fact, over the next few months, there were
several more reports of Jarawas coming out of their forests.
(To read more about the Jarawa’s trysts with their neighbours, read Pankaj’s article “Jarawa Excursion”, published in Frontline in 1998)
Had you known about the Jarawa before that?
The
Jarawa have always incited a huge amount of fear and curiosity. I
remember a time during my first visit when I was on a harbour cruise
with one of the local boats that take tourists to popular sites around
Port Blair: I heard one of the tourist guides telling stories to her
captive audience about how the Jarawa are an extremely dangerous people;
that they applied their saliva, which was poisonous, to their
arrowheads before shooting at you. Knowing this to be untrue, I became
incensed and spoke up, telling her she couldn’t claim such things
without any evidence.
At
the same time, there were organisations that would defend the rights of
the Jarawa. One of the first was the Society for Andaman and Nicobar
Ecology (SANE), started by Samir Acharya. SANE began their work much
before anyone else was even in the picture. Samir has been a pioneer of
tribal rights and environmental activism in the islands for almost 30
years, and is a great influence on me. Along with BNHS, we took a case
for the protection of the forests and the tribal communities here to the
High Court and then to the Supreme Court in 1998. At that time, one
knew only a little bit about these issues.
While
reading your book, I noticed the use of language that is particular to
the islands – from a colonial definition of tribes as “primitive relics”
to the contemporary “settlers”, the people who’ve come from outside.
How have you seen the dynamics between them play out?
There’s
a complex historical context to these issues. According to recent
research, indigenous people have been on the islands for 30,000 to
40,000 years. Most of the current population came to the islands from
the 19th century onwards; the Cellular Jail itself was built only in the
beginning of the 20th century. All that’s a very short story – it’s
only 150 years old.
The
settler population is even more recent – it only dates back to the late
1950s and ’60s, when the Indian government thought of the Andamans as an
‘empty space’, and encouraged people to go live there. The government
often gave incentives such as 10 acres of free land to settlers. It’s a
very interesting history, and it’s only now that people are studying it
deeply – who were these settlers? What were their compulsions and
limitations that forced them to make such a choice? We have to remember
that they were also vulnerable.
Historically
speaking, we have put them in conflict with the Jarawa, because these
lands originally belonged to indigenous peoples. And sure, with two
communities living side by side, with one’s lifestyle being imposed on
the other, much conflict has ensued; biodiversity has suffered.
Administration officials admit in private that they are unable to do
anything to ease the tension between the tribal communities and the
settlers. The two groups are locked in a tussle over land rights, and
the atmosphere has been vitiated by some administrative policies of the
past.
The settlers aren’t
the ‘outsiders’ though – what’s interesting is that they, as local
people too, are very upset with people like us from the mainland taking a
stand on island issues. The insider-outsider card is played often,
however futile it may be. The real challenge is that policy decisions
are made far away in New Delhi.
At
a talk you recently held in New Delhi, you mentioned that it’s
difficult for you to fully comprehend the situation of the indigenous
communities of the ANI today. Could you delve a bit deeper into that?
At
this point of time, I don’t know enough of what is happening, say in
the case of the Jarawa. In any case, we have limited knowledge of these
communities, and that in itself can be problematic. We are often asked
how we can represent the Jarawa, even going to court for them. The work
we have done is from the outside, we are operating as outsiders. What we
do know, is that changes are taking place very rapidly. The outlook for
indigenous peoples is a very sad state of affairs – physically and
culturally – and one that’s being repeated in different parts of the
world, not just the Andamans.
One
interesting thing is that what’s being tried for the Jarawa – in terms
of education, health, rehabilitation – is better than what’s been done
before. There is an awareness and an acknowledgement that we have to do
things differently. What we don’t understand is whether that’s good
enough. If the Jarawa were still in the forest, and hadn’t come out, it
would be a different situation. But they have been coming out and
interacting, and if we remain fully aware of the historicity and context
behind their presence here, that’s what may help. But at the end of the
day, I don’t really know. The position of the administrators is
extremely unenviable.
Now
that there’s more of a focus on the development of infrastructure and
strategic outposts on the islands, how have you seen policy pertinent to
the ANI evolve over the past decade?
My
key concern and contention is that, not just in the last ten, but fifty
years; government policy, planning, bureaucracy and the political
establishment has not understood the key challenges faced by the
islands. The key thesis, if I might, is that the idea of ‘flux’ is
central to the existence of the islands. There are three levels of flux
that the islands are facing – socio-cultural, ecological and most
important, perhaps, geological. You can think of it as a pyramid, at the
very top is the socio-cultural context – for instance, the constant
change and dynamism of the communities: indigenous peoples such as the
Jarawa, the Onge, the Great Andamanese, the Sentinelese, and the
settlers who have come in in the last few decades. Their reality is
dependent on the next block of the pyramid, the ecological and
environmental context – the land, water, soil, coast, sea – which
decides the conditions in which these communities will live. You have to
take into account the unique tropical conditions, the climate, the high
endemism of species. The third, and perhaps most critical level of flux
is the geological context. The islands are located in one of the most
seismically active zones in the world. The tsunami of 2004 was caused by
an earthquake off the coast of Sumatra, just a couple of hundred
nautical miles from Nicobar.
For
the last fifty years, we have not acknowledged these independent, but
connected realities. A recent NITI Aayog report does not take any of
this into account while planning large infrastructure projects. In 2009,
at a defense-related seminar, former President Kalam talked about
building a nuclear power station in the islands, in a landscape where
you’ve had earthquakes which have been 9.3 on the Richter scale. Imagine
the vulnerability we’re setting ourselves up for. What happens to the
nuclear power plant if another earthquake or tsunami happens? Similar
plans were made long ago in a 1965 report. The same ignorance is still
prevalent in 2017, despite so much more information being available,
despite a deeper understanding, despite technological advances.
(To learn more about policy measures designed for the islands, read Pankaj’s article “Islands on the Seam”, published in The Hindu this March)
Tourism in the islands is on the rise. From an ecological perspective, how much tourism is too much tourism?
That’s
a genuine concern, but the scale of tourism hasn’t increased all that
much yet. The number of proposals to take tourism to more remote parts
of the islands is small, but growing. There are issues of resource
availability and waste management which will have to be considered. On
the whole, I find it difficult to say no to tourism, but it’s a slippery
slope. A very critical understanding needs to be built, and we need to
develop the tools and arguments to help people understand that for all
its benefits, tourism isn’t the ultimate solution.
Even
from an economic and livelihoods perspective, tourist arrivals in 2004
fell from a lakh to zero in a matter of a week after the tsunami. So
it’s important to remember that tourism could become unviable at any
point, and we shouldn’t be putting all our livelihoods eggs in the
tourism basket, so to speak.
We recently wrote about a photo exhibition of Pankaj Sekhsaria’s photographs of the islands, reproduced in silk. Read about it here.
The exhibition travels next to The Story of Space festival, an
interdisciplinary arts and science festival in Panjim, Goa from November
10-19.
Sekhsaria writes a regular column on the environment for The Hindu. You can read it here. Pick up a copy (print or digital) of Islands in Flux here.
Aadya is an independent
researcher currently working with Nature inFocus. Through her work, she
has been exploring the intersection between livelihoods, environmental
conservation and skill development with a focus on Himalayan
communities. In her spare time, she enjoys playing pretend naturalist,
musician, photographer and writer.