Thursday, April 22, 2010

Fort full of life

FORT FULL OF LIFE
http://www.frontlineonnet.com/stories/20100507270906400.htm

TEXT & PHOTOGRAPHS: PANKAJ SEKHSARIA

Jaisalmer Fort’s uniqueness – it supports a huge resident population – may also be the greatest threat to its existence.



A view of the fort, which has inside it residential quarters, temples, hotels and markets.

MENTION the word fort and the images that come to mind are all too common – elaborate histories; kings, queens and palace intrigues; battle-worn warriors; huge stone ramparts with intricate carvings; crumbling walls of empty palaces; and large desolate spaces, peopled these days by a large number of tourists. All forts are about history, of accounts of the past and of stories of the dead. All forts, except one!

In the far western corner of India is an exceptional fort that rises like a golden miracle from the flat, unforgiving sands of the Thar desert. Constructed atop the Trikuta Hill in Jaisalmer, it is the second oldest fort in Rajasthan and one of the largest in the world.



The thoroughfare leading to the fort. The spherical stone balls on the wall were used against intruders.

Three layers of walls constitute this magnificent structure. The outer, or lower, layer is made of solid stone blocks that also help reinforce the rubble of the hill. The middle wall, or second layer, snakes around the fort. The third and innermost wall was the vantage from where Rajput warriors hurled boiling oil and water and massive round rocks at intruders. The fort also has 99 bastions, 92 of which were built between 1633 and 1647.



The palace complex inside the fort. It is a museum now.

What is perhaps most fascinating, however, is that for the better part of its 800-year history, the fort was the city of Jaisalmer and the city the fort. Like all forts, Jaisalmer has its own history – a fascinating blend of fact, myth and legend.

In 1156 A.D., Rawal Jaisal, a descendant of the Yadav clan and a Bhatti Rajput, is said to have abandoned his fort at Lodurva, about 18 kilometres away, and, on the advice of a local hermit, founded the new fort and capital of Jaisalmer.



A fresco on a wall of the palace.

The fort stood at the crossroads of important trade routes that camel caravans used to carry silk, spices and dry fruits to Central Asia. In the 13th century, Alauddin Khilji famously attacked and conquered the fort and held on to it for nearly nine years. His attack, it is believed, was provoked by a Bhatti raid on a caravan. The next important war occurred nearly three centuries later when the Mughal emperor Humayun attacked the fort in 1541. Many more raids followed as the fortunes of the owners fluctuated, as happens in the course of history.

The first settlements outside the fort walls, to accommodate the growing population of Jaisalmer, are said to have come up in the 17th century. Today these settlements have spread out in all directions around the fort.



Colourful turbans for sale inside the fort complex.

However fascinating the history of Jaisalmer may be, there is one dimension of the fort that makes it unique: it is believed to be one of the very few (perhaps the only) “living forts”. An entire community lives within its walls – residential quarters, temples, hotels, restaurants and markets exist cheek by jowl in an unlikely mosaic. An estimated 5,000 people reside inside the fort. Thousands of others visit the fort annually as tourists. Chaiwallas ply their trade under ancient arches, modern restaurants operate under open skies, traders run curio shops in the narrow winding streets. Not surprisingly, the fort is popular in the world of cinema. The most well known perhaps is Satyajit Ray’s 1974 production, Sonar Kella (Golden Fort). It is said to have provided the first big boost to tourism in the region. A more recent production that featured the fort is the Bollywood film Nanhe Jaisalmer featuring Bobby Deol.



A folk musician at the entrance to the fort.

A striking aspect of the fort is the group of Jain temples constructed between the 12th and 15th centuries. They were built, it is believed, to protect some 11th century palm manuscripts. They are popular pilgrimage sites and are also of considerable archaeological importance. Dedicated to the various Jain tirthankaras, these are built in the famous Dilwara style, which takes its name from the temple complex located on the hill station of Mount Abu, also in Rajasthan.

The fort museum is very popular with tourists for its collection of royal items and a depiction of the life of the Bhatti rajas and other people who lived here. In addition, Jaisalmer is famous for its intricately carved havelis, many of which are inhabited by descendants of the original owners. Some are located within the fort, while others, like the Patwon ki Haveli, are outside it.



Foreign tourists getting a feel of fort life. Tourism is a great revenue earner for Jaisalmer.

The Jaisalmer Fort is by no means the only attraction of this desert region. The sandy, barren and seemingly lifeless landscape is home to a dazzling array of wildlife that is rare and threatened. Not far from the fort, straddling the districts of Jaisalmer and Barmer, is the Desert National Park that sprawls over nearly 3,100 sq. km. It is as unique an ecosystem as it is fragile. It is a little-known system that plays host to a wide variety of life – mammals such as the cinkara, the Indian wolf and the desert fox; reptiles such as the monitor lizard, the spiny tailed lizard and the saw-scaled viper; and birds such as the imperial sand grouse, the common sand grouse, the crane (common and demoiselle), the partridge, the vulture, the pea fowl and the great Indian bustard.



A pair of great Indian bustards. Only about 500 of these birds remain on the planet, and the Desert National Park offers the best chance to see them.

The Desert National Park offers the best chance to see the great Indian bustard. Only about 500 of these birds, known as the Gondavan in local language, remain on the planet. Some reports say it has been wiped out over 90 per cent of its former range and survives only in a few places in the country – parts of Rajasthan; Kutch in Gujarat; the Solapur, Vidarbha and Marathwada regions of Maharashtra; and some parts of Andhra Pradesh.

The 2,000-acre Sudasri enclosure in the national park is located 50 km from Jaisalmer and is popular among those wanting a glimpse of desert wildlife. And the surprises continue; wildlife ‘safaris’ can be done on camel carts organised by the Forest Department.

Challenges

Not all those who visit Jaisalmer are interested in or make the effort to step out to look at the wild wealth of the region. The fort remains the star attraction, and no visitor to Jaisalmer comes away without being impressed by it. Not everyone, however, is aware of the serious challenges faced by this priceless heritage. The Jaisalmer Fort finds mention in two negative lists, if one can call them that. The Smithsonian Institution (Washington, DC) has, for instance, listed it among the 15 most significant but endangered cultural sites of the world. “The world’s most precious historic and artistic sites can be visited today – but might be gone tomorrow,” it says. The fort is also on the list of eight “threatened wonders” put out by Wanderlust, the United Kingdom-based travel magazine.

Surprising though it may sound, it is water that is at the heart of the fort’s miseries. When it was built, the fort had no provision for flowing water or sewage disposal. Until recently, residents sourced water from wells located within the fort. Piped water supply is available now and a sewage system has also been put in place. These changes, experts argue, are proving disastrous. Water that flows in and leaks from the system is seeping into and impacting the foundations of the fort.



A desert fox at the park.

The heavy monsoon of 1993 is said to have permanently or partially damaged nearly 250 historical buildings. Recent earthquakes have made things worse. In 2001, an earthquake that measured 7 on the Richter scale caused unprecedented damage. More recently, additional faultlines have been discovered in the region, raising concern about the impact another earthquake will have on the fort.

Efforts are being made to deal with the situation, and a number of international and national agencies, such as the Jaisalmer in Jeopardy Trust, the Jaisalmer Heritage Trust, the World Monuments Fund (U.S.), and the Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), are at work in Jaisalmer. The biggest challenge would be to resolve the issues around water usage.

There is some apprehension in the people living in the fort that steps taken to save it will impact the tourism industry that they depend on for their livelihood.

That this is a “living fort” makes the challenge of restoration and conservation much more difficult. The challenge has to be met successfully if this 800-year-old fort is to continue living far into the future.


THE SINKING OF THE NICOBARS

THE SINKING OF THE NICOBARS
http://infochangeindia.org/Agenda/Coastal-communities/The-sinking-of-the-Nicobars.html

The earthquake that caused the tsunami of December 2004 has altered the topography and ecology of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands forever, writes Pankaj Sekhsaria. So far the impact of such marked changes in topography do not seem to have been taken into account by policymakers and government

Sippighat, outside Port Blair, submerged after the tsunami

If there is one thing that immediately springs to mind when the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are mentioned today, it is the devastating tsunami of December 26, 2004. Official figures give a sense of the massive damage that was caused to life and property: over 3,500 people dead or missing; nearly 8,000 hectares of paddy and plantation rendered useless; 938 boats completely damaged; more than 150,000 head of cattle lost.

These aggregated figures for the entire island chain hide an important detail that has not received the attention and analysis it deserves.

Of the 3,513 people reported dead or missing only 64 were from the Andaman group of islands; the remaining 3,449 were from the islands in the Nicobar group. Seventy-six per cent of the agricultural and paddy land destroyed, and 80% of livestock loss were also reported from the Nicobars. Likewise, nearly 70% of the construction of new housing for the tsunami-affected is in the Nicobar Islands.

It is evident that the impact of the tsunami was much greater in the Nicobar Islands than in the Andamans. So, while the Nicobars account for only 22% and 12% of the area and population, respectively, of the entire chain of islands, 98% of the deaths and 76% of loss of agricultural land occurred here. The damage caused was inversely proportional to the area and population of the two groups of islands, and strikingly so (see Table 1 and Table 2).

Tectonic movements

Although the tsunami was seen as the main cause of the damage, it was actually the earthquake that caused the tsunami in the first place that was responsible for most of the damage here. While the tectonic movements triggered by the earthquake catalysed the tsunami, they also caused a huge and permanent shift in the lay of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands.

Assessments by a number of scientists from various institutes, including the University of Colorado in the USA and the Geological Survey of India, indicate that the Andaman group of islands were thrust upwards by four to six feet while parts of the Nicobar Islands went significantly under -- four feet of submergence in Car Nicobar; nearly 15 feet at the southernmost tip -- Indira Point -- on Great Nicobar Island. This important change in the lay of the islands was reported to have occurred almost immediately after the earthquake, a few minutes before the huge waves struck the coastline. Pre- and post-earthquake satellite maps released by the National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA) show striking visual evidence of this. It also explains the huge submergence and damage experienced in the Nicobars, though this group covers a relatively small area and is more thinly populated.

Jogindernagar, Great Nicobar

Ecological changes

Tectonic activity and the submergence and emergence it caused also resulted in significant ecological changes in the islands. A survey by the Andaman and Nicobar Environment Team revealed, for instance, that huge areas (nearly 60 sq km) of coral reefs along the western and northern coasts of Middle and North Andaman Islands were lifted up, permanently exposed, and destroyed. Studies in the Nicobar group of islands by the Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Nature (SACON) showed that immense damage was caused to coastal ecosystems by the joint impact of the tsunami waves and the permanent subsidence and resultant permanent ingress of seawater. Coastal features like beaches, mangroves and littoral forests were the most badly impacted. Coastal wildlife like the endemic Nicobari megapode, the giant robber crab and the Malayan box turtle were among the species worst affected.

Coral reefs off the coasts of the Nicobars were also hit by a combination of submergence, a resultant increase in turbidity, and physical damage caused by tonnes of debris thrown back and forth by the furious water. A survey conducted by the Zoological Survey of India reported large-scale sedimentation on coral reefs around Great Nicobar Island, following the tsunami. A drop in the number of associated coral reef fauna, including nudibranchs, flat worms, alpheid and mantis shrimps, and hermit and brachyuran crabs was also reported.

Mangroves, Mayabundar, North Andaman

Increased vulnerabilities

Significantly, the region is reported to have become much more seismically active now. Data gathered by the United States Geological Service (USGS) show that over 20 earthquakes of a magnitude above M6, in addition to several hundred of lesser intensity, have struck the region in the last five years. The most powerful was the September 2007 quake that had a magnitude greater than M8. It was followed by a tsunami warning; there have been at least half-a-dozen such warnings since 2004.

It would appear that the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which have always been seismically active and therefore unstable, are even more vulnerable now. It is crucial that this increased threat becomes an important aspect of policy and development planning on the islands. Likewise, changes in the islands’ topography on account of tectonic movements must be factored into future planning. An important dimension, for instance, is the alteration along the coasts of all the islands of the high tide line (HTL). Unless this is recalibrated, any management or implementation of laws and regulations related to the coastal zone cannot be carried out effectively. They would in fact be meaningless.

Table 1: Island-wise losses
Island People (dead or missing) Livestock loss Agricultural land lost Permanent housing Area Population (2001)
Total number Per cent Total number Per cent Area in hectares Per cent Number Per cent Sq km Per cent Number Per cent
Andamans 64 2 31,521 20 1,877 23.5 2,796 28.6 6,408 77.68 314,048 88.1
South Andaman 7 19,634 1,667 823
Little Andaman 54 11,165 117 1,973
Middle Andaman 722 93
Nicobar 3,449 98 126,056 80 6,115 76.5 7,001 71.4 1,841 22.32 42,068 11.9
Car Nicobar 854 50,350 969.35 3,941
Chowra 117 11,896 230.4 346
Teressa 17,307 743.96 506
Katchal 1,551 18,678 1,628.50 315
Nancowry 378 1,440 256.57 269
Kamorta 7,501 637.4 518
Trinket 2,590 328.5
Little Nicobar 2,267 111
Great Nicobar 549 12,298 1,291.28 995
Kondul 336
Pilomilow 823
Bambooka 570 29.55
Total 3,513 157,577 100 7,992 100 9,797 100 8,249 100 356,252 100

Table 2: Losses in percentage (island-wise)
Andamans (%) Nicobars (%) Total
Area (sq km) 6,408 (77.68) 1,841(22.32) 8,249
Population (2001) 314,048 (88) 42,068 (12) 356,252
People (dead or missing) 64 (2) 3,449 (98) 3,513
Livestock loss 31,521 (20) 126,056 (80) 157,577
Agricultural land lost (hectares) 1,877 (23.5) 6,115 (76.5) 7,992
Permanent housing 2,796(28.6) 7,001 (71.4) 9,797

The changed scenario also has direct implications on issues like land that can and cannot be allotted for reconstruction or for agriculture and plantation, as also on the materials and design of new buildings being built on the islands.

Fishers in Great Nicobar

All these aspects need careful consideration because they are the foundations on which any scenario for the future of the islands must be built. Many worry that they are not being given the importance and consideration they deserve. This was starkly evident in September 2009, when former President Dr A P J Abdul Kalam was in Port Blair to unveil Andaman Vision 2020 “for the strategic development of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands by the year 2020”. Speaking at a national seminar on ‘Security and Development of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands’, Kalam advocated, amongst other things, the construction of a 250 MW dedicated nuclear power station on the islands, and use of the islands as bases for static aircraft carrier and a nuclear submarine-based fleet.

It’s as though the earthquake and tsunami of December 2004, and the hundreds of subsequent earthquakes, did not happen at all! Whatever visions of power we might have for ourselves, ‘security and development’ cannot be ensured by industrial and military might alone. If we ignore the foundational contours of the region’s topography, its seismic instability, and its environment, we only increase the risks and our subsequent vulnerability. And we do so at our own peril.

(Pankaj Sekhsaria is the author of Troubled Islands -- Writings on the Indigenous Peoples and Environment of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands)

Infochange News & Features, April 2010

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Day of the dolphin

Day of the dolphin

PANKAJ SEKHSARIA
http://www.hindu.com/mag/2010/04/11/stories/2010041150230500.htm

The Gangetic River Dolphin has been notified as the national aquatic animal. Will this save the animal from the many threats it faces today? PANKAJ SEKHSARIA


If the dolphin must have its day, good intentions alone will not suffice.


Photo: Dr. Sandeep Behera

New lease of life:A Gangetic dolphin being released in Budhabalanga river in 2006. This was the first sighting of Gangetic dolphin in Orissa.

It can only be considered an extremely positive step that the Gangetic River Dolphin Platanista gangetica gangeticahas now been notified as the national aquatic animal. The decision was taken in the first meeting of the recently formed National Ganga River Basin Authority that was chaired by the Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh. The move has received an enthusiastic welcome by the conservation community. Writing in the November issue of the journal ZOO's Print, Dr. Randall Reeves, Chairman of IUCN/SSC Cetacean Specialist Group, expressed his pleasant surprise, “..to see the small and somewhat cryptic freshwater dolphin occupying the ‘throne' of national aquatic animal…All things considered,” he continues, “it is an admirable decision by the Central Government to give this honour to the susu(as the Ganga dolphin is often called in India).”

The population of the endangered Gangetic Dolphin in India today is only about 2,000 individuals spread over the rivers of the Gangetic basin and the Brahmaputra river system. The dolphin and the rivers they live in are inextricably linked — something that can be seen in the way the creature has evolved to survive in these rather specialised environmental conditions. For one, these dolphins are almost blind — the turbid waters of the river systems having made the use of eyes almost redundant. The eyes are merely pin holes, have no lenses and are believed to be used only to differentiate between light and dark. They mainly use echo-location to find food along the floor of the river. They also exhibit another peculiar characteristic of swimming on the side, dragging one flipper against the muddy river bed. This, it is believed, enables them to navigate in water streams with low water depth, a well known characteristic of the seasonal rivers in the sub-continent.

Tied to the river

The water levels and flow patterns in rivers also greatly determine the spread and the migration of the dolphins. They are known to collect in deeper parts of the rivers with a preference for areas with eddies in the dry periods from October to April, and migrate to other stretches in the monsoons when the water levels rise.

The health of the river, then, is crucial to the long-term well-being of the dolphin.

While poaching for oil, fishing and accidental entanglement in nets are important concerns, there is evidence that dam and barrage construction is one of the biggest threats to the dolphin across its entire range. A 2006 WWF Nepal report points out, for instance, that “Barrages on the Mahakali River (Sarda in India) at Banbasa on the India-Nepal border in 1928, and at Sardanagar in 1974 about 160 km into Indian Territory, have resulted in the extinction of dolphins from the Mahakali River.”

Photo: Dr. Abdul Wakid.

Well Adapted :In Kukurmara area of Kulsi River near Guwahati, Assam.

Dams and barrages not only fragment dolphin populations, they also degrade downstream habitat, create reservoirs with high sedimentation and change the fish and invertebrate species found in the waters. Luxuriant growth of macrophytes and excessive siltation have, for example, eliminated suitable habitat immediately above the Farakka Barrage and reduction in water availability downstream of the barrage has eliminated dry-season habitat for more than 300 km.

The other big concern is the increased pollution of rivers caused by chemical pesticide and fertilizers runoff from agriculture and the indiscriminate release of untreated industrial effluents into rivers.

Research by a team led by Dr. Leo Yeung of the City University of Hongkong recently revealed that a huge pollutant load enters the Ganga at its confluence with the Yamuna in Allahabad. Their paper, published in the March 2009 issue of the journal Chemosphere, points out that “…(the Yamuna) is also one of the most polluted rivers in the world, especially around New Delhi, where approximately 57 per cent of the city's wastes are discharged into the river. There are approximately 45 major industries, including coal-based thermal power plants, fertilizer, food processing, textiles, insecticide manufacturing, and electroplating located along the river.”

The waters of the Yamuna and most of our other rivers that have been the source of life and nourishment for centuries are, now, almost dead themselves. The impact this has on the dolphins and other plant and animal life in the water and the millions of people who live along these rivers can only be imagined.

The fate of our rivers are symptomatic of deep and underlying problems with our development process where damming of rivers, chemicalisation of our agriculture, rapid industrialisation and urbanisation have been given priority over everything else. More than 168 large dams, for instance, have been planned in the Brahmaputra river basin alone, with little realisation that this will change the entire up and down stream ecological systems and adversely impact the dolphin. It is precisely these kinds of developments that are working as a noose around our rivers and the diverse life found in them. Recognition of the dolphin as the national aquatic animal has been followed by commitments for their protection in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. A further interest in the dolphin has also been spurred in Assam, where the creature was declared the state aquatic animal over a year ago. If the dolphin must have its day, good intentions alone will not suffice. The Gangetic dolphin is one of only three surviving species of freshwater dolphins on this planet. The fourth one, the Yangtze River Dolphin in China, went extinct as recently as 2006. A lot will need to be done if the Gangetic Dolphin is to avoid a similar fate. A declaration that accorded it national status will have, otherwise, amounted to nothing more than symbolic lip service.

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Protected Area Update - April 2010

Dear Friends,
Here is the list of contents and the editorial for the new issue of the Protected Area Update - Vol XVI, No. 2, April 2010.

Please write to me at psekhsaria@gmail.com if you want more details or the entire issue over email.

----
PROTECTED AREA UPDATE
News and Information from protected areas in India and South Asia

Vol. XVI No. 2
April 2010 (No. 84)
----

LIST OF CONTENTS

EDITORIAL
The Western Ghats in focus

NEWS FROM INDIAN STATES

ANDHRA PRADESH
Nuapada swamps to be declared a conservation reserve

ASSAM
Four suspected poachers arrested from Orang NP
Call to declare Poba Reserve Forest a wildlife sanctuary
BSF to help protect Kaziranga NP
SSB proposal to set up border outpost in Manas NP
Health camps for patrol elephants and staff of Manas NP and Pobitora WLS
Timber cut illegally from Manas NP seized

GUJARAT
Cell proposed for management plans for PAs
CAG points out deficiencies in wildlife and forest management in Gujarat
10 per cent rise in black buck population in and around Velavadar NP
Gir staff poorly equipped with knowledge of wildlife and wildlife law: study

HIMACHAL PRADESH
Red Jungle Fowl breeding program in Renuka and Simbalbara WLSs in HP

KARNATAKA
Large fire in BRT WLS
Ban on night traffic through Bandipur National Park lifted again
25 acre Kollegal-BRT WLS corridor handed over to Forest Department
Bhimgad declared as a WLS
HC notice on night safari in Bannerghatta NP

KERALA
12 new IBAs in Kerala

MANIPUR
Save Loktak Lake Campaign

MADHYA PRADESH
State Forest Minister calls for CBI inquiry into tiger disappearance from Panna TR

MAHARASHTRA
Village inside Tadoba Andhari TR to sue FD for mining on their community land
Students ask for plastic ban within Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary
Proposal to remove temple area from Bhimashankar WLS rejected
CCTV cameras at Sanjay Gandhi NP gates to track visitor movements
GIB Sanctuary area down by 7000 sq km
NBWL rejects widening of NH-17 because of impact on Karnala WLS

ORISSA
Public-private initiative for Simlipal TR
MoEF asks for specific wildlife management plan for electricity transmission line through Chandaka-Dampara WLS
Management plans for 14 elephant corridors in Orissa

TAMIL NADU
Bi-lingual nature guide to Kalakad Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve
Nilgiri Natural History Society launched

WEST BENGAL
Villagers invoke Forest Rights Act; take over forest tract adjoining Jaldapara WLS
Drive to demolish illegal structures in the East Kolkata Wetlands

NATIONAL NEWS FROM INDIA
Internet group for tracking insect migration
NTCA regional office to be set up in Nagpur
Expert Panel on Western Ghats constituted
Funds released for village relocation from core/critical tiger habitats
Figures for tigers and leopards killed in India since 1994
Save Western Ghats Meet 2010
Comprehensive database launched for tiger mortality and crime in India
Workshop on Marine Mammal Stranding held in Kochi
Two day seminar on Gangetic Dolphin held in Patna
Task Force on Project Elephant
Expert committee for protected areas assessment in the North East

SOUTH ASIA
Bangladesh
Bangladesh launches Tiger Action Plan

OPPORTUNITIES
MPhil in Conservation Leadership, University of Cambridge
Ramsar Small Grants Fund
Ravi Sankaran Inlaks Fellowship Program for Field Biology, Ecology and Conservation

IN THE SUPREME COURT
HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS PROPOSED INSIDE ASKOT WILDLIFE SANCTUARY
MoEF INTRODUCES FIVE SPECIFIC SCIENTIFIC INITIATIVES


EDITORIAL

THE WESTERN GHATS IN FOCUS
The Western Ghats are, without doubt, one of the richest eco-regional systems in the entire subcontinent. Straddling six states from Gujarat in the North to Kerala and Tamil Nadu in the south, the 1600 odd kms long mountain range is home to a wide diversity of life just as it supports innumerable human communities and cultures. The beauty of the landscapes here is unmatched, endemism in the forests is high and many rivers that nourish large parts of peninsular India originate here. Not surprisingly a large number of protected areas dot the entire length of the ghats.
It is only to expected then that the Western Ghats have appeared regularly in the pages of the Protected Area Update over the years; something of interest and importance is always happening here. Nothing however matches the presence they have in this particular issue – it is almost like it’s become a Western Ghats special.
There has been a lot of very localized activity along the length of the mountain range that you will see reports of: children in schools in the vicinity of the Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary in Maharashtra demanding that plastic be banned from within sanctuary limits, the creation of 12 new Important Bird Areas in Kerala or the ongoing controversy over the ban on night traffic on national highways inside the Bandipur National Park.
A lot is also happening that has an appeal and relevance cutting across state and political boundaries. A large conservation research and action initiative has been going on under the aegis of the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), the well known Save Western Ghats movement is on the way to being revived, a new Nilgiri Natural History Society has been formed and the Ministry of Environment and Forests has also set up an ‘Expert panel on the Western Ghats’ to ‘assist in the preservation, conservation and rejuvenation of this environmentally sensitive and ecologically significant region.’
In another commendable development the Minister of Environment and Forests, Mr Jairam Ramesh, recently organized a special meeting of 43 Members of Parliament from the 51 districts which have the Western Ghats running through them. It is one of those rare political initiatives where politics is not bound by political boundaries.
It has been argued often that if political constituencies had been carved out on ecological or eco-regional criteria, politics would have been different. Ecological systems, be they mountain ranges, river systems or the coast often get looked at in a piecemeal manner. The integrity of what is a single unit is completely overtaken by other considerations and the consequences have only been adverse. The Minister’s initiative could well be the starting point of some kind of a more holistic approach and other eco-regional systems too might try and pick up from what is being attempted here.
The Western Ghats have also been lucky in that there have always been vibrant local communities, NGOs, researchers and officials who have continued to engage with the complexities and work with the challenges of this unique mountain range. To say, however, that things will now be different in the Western Ghats would be putting the cart much ahead of the horse. We have to wait and watch to see how the present initiatives unfold. There is no denying that they look very promising and one hopes that some of the promise will indeed be realized in the future.


---
Protected Area Update
Vol. XVI, No. 1, February 2010 (No. 83)

Editor: Pankaj Sekhsaria
Editorial Assistance: Reshma Jathar
Illustrations: Madhuvanti Anantharajan
Produced by: Kalpavriksh

Ideas, comments, news and information may please be sent to the editorial address:

KALPAVRIKSH
Apartment 5, Shri Dutta Krupa, 908 Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India.
Tel/Fax: 020 – 25654239.
Email: psekhsaria@gmail.com
Website: www.kalpavriksh.org

PUBLICATION OF THE PA UPDATE HAS BEEN SUPPORTED BY
- Foundation for Ecological Security (FES)
http://fes.org.in/
- Duleep Matthai Nature Conservation Trust
C/o FES
- Greenpeace India
www.greenpeace.org/india/
- Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
www.rspb.org.uk/
- Indian Bird Conservation Network
http://www.ibcn.in/
***
Information has been sourced from different newspapers and the following websites

http://wildlifewatch.in/
http://indiaenvironmentportal.org.in

Sunday, January 24, 2010

Protected Area Update - New Issue: February 2010

PROTECTED AREA UPDATE
News and Information from protected areas in India and South Asia

Vol. XVI No. 1
February 2010 (No. 83)


LIST OF CONTENTS
EDITORIAL
Don’t forget those on the frontlines

NEWS FROM INDIAN STATES

ANDHRA PRADESH
Jerdon's courser sighted in Sri Lankamalleswara Wildlife Sanctuary

ASSAM
Database of all rhinos in Assam
Increased human - elephant conflict in Assam
Over one lakh people visited Kaziranga National Park in 2008-09
PWD study for diverting traffic from NH 37 section through Kaziranga NP
14 rhinos poached in Kaziranga NP in 2009
Ramsar tag proposed for Dhir Beel, Son Beel, Kaziranga Beel and Dordoibam Beel
Two senior Nagaland officials suspect in rhino poaching

BIHAR
Railway track creates new rhino habitat adjoining Valmiki TR
Tourism promotion plans for Valmiki TR
Tiger Protection Force proposed for Valmiki TR
Mining ban shows positive results in Valmiki Tiger Reserve

GUJARAT
Bio-tech efforts to conserve Gir lion

JAMMU & KASHMIR
Satellite collars for black bears in Dachigam NP

KARNATAKA
Work to proceed on Mysore –Mananthavadi road through the Nagarhole NP

KERALA
Joint initiatives with Tamil Nadu for Periyar TR

MADHYA PRADESH
State signs tri-partite agreement with NTCA for tiger conservation
Wildlife law enforcement and training in Bhopal

MAHARASHTRA
Dismantled film sets degrading forests adjoining the Sanjay Gandhi NP
Van majoors protest non-payment of wages; stops tourists from entering Nagzira WLS
Deer and neelgai translocated from Nagpur to Bor Wildlife Sanctuary
Shifting of villages from Tadoba Andhari TR to be expedited
MoEF rejects mining project near Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve

ORISSA
Seven month ban on marine fishing in Orissa from November 2009
Oriental small-clawed otter reported from Karlapat Wildlife Sanctuary

PUNJAB
Illegal fishing rampant in Harike WLS

RAJASTHAN
Illegal fishing in Sariska TR; four arrested
NTCA approves Darrah Tiger Reserve
New road threat to Ranthambore TR

TAMIL NADU
New facilities, tourism initiatives at Mudumalai Tiger Reserve
Convention held on livelihood rights of peasants, repatriates and adivasis of Nilgiri District

UTTAR PRADESH
Additional compensation from FD to those killed in feline attacks
Advanced detectors to locate metal traps in Dudhwa TR
Daily wages in Dudhwa TR not paid for seven months
17 tiger cubs sighted in Dudhwa TR
Rhinos near Indo-Nepal border to get unique identities

UTTARAKHAND
70% resorts around Corbett TR used for non-wildlife tourism

WEST BENGAL
Pollution, road widening project threaten East Kolkata wetlands
State signs tri-partite agreement for tiger conservation; allotted Rs. 300 crores for Buxa and Sunderbans TRs
Gaur run over by train near Chapramari WLS
Growth in elephant, rhino & gaur population in Dooars region
Dalma WLS elephant herd caught in Maoist-police war in West Bengal
Deer in Sunderbans being poached for Kolkata hotels
Move to supplement tiger prey base in Sunderbans

NATIONAL NEWS FROM INDIA
Forest Area Under Encroachment
SeasonWatch – A project to monitor plant phenology across India
IGNOU, WWF offer PG Diploma in environmental law
New threat to vultures from Ketoprofen
Ministry of Tourism to carry out audit of seven protected areas
Central Empowered Committee of the SC under purview of RTI
Sanctuary Wildlife Awards 2009

SOUTH ASIA
NEPAL
Bardia NP expanded by 900 sq. kms

PAKISTAN
Virus kills more than 70 ibex in Khirthar NP

OPPORTUNITIES
WWF Prince Bernhard Scholarships for nature conservation
CEPF-ATREE Western Ghats Small Grants
Call for nominations: Wildlife Tourism Awards
JRFs needed for research in the Southern Western Ghats

UPCOMING
13th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Commons

EDITORIAL

DON'T FORGET THOSE ON THE FRONTLINES

If technology, money and good intentions were enough, there would be no reason for any concern about the fate of Indian wildlife. There is plenty of that in evidence even in this issue of the PA Update – calls for more PAs, declaration of more tiger reserves, larger demands and commitments for money, sophisticated equipment for surveillance and use of newer technologies for various aspects of research, management, and protection. Much of this is necessary and welcome. But, is it enough? Are we, in the clamour for all this and more, losing sight of something more essential and absolutely fundamental?
There are at least two reports in the pages that follow that force these important questions – about the treatment and the neglect of the foot soldiers of conservation; those in the forest staff that are out there, working where it matters the most. What can be the justification for non payment of many months of wages to daily wage workers in the Nagzira Wildlife Sanctuary in Maharashtra and in Uttar Pradesh’s Dudhwa Tiger Reserve? It is indeed a sad state of affairs when these workers have to strike work and block tourist traffic (like in Nagzira) to bring attention to their plight.
Needless to say, these are not new happenings and delayed salaries are only one of an array of problems that they are forced to face – working conditions are poor and outright dangerous sometimes; there are no family care facilities; training and equipment are often inadequate and there are few avenues for promotions and other incentives.
If this is the treatment that will be meted out to the most vulnerable can we really hope that management, conservation or protection will happen effectively? Lofty hopes and pronunciations will remain merely those if issues of brass-tacks continue to be neglected in this manner.
When many crores of rupees are being allocated for wildlife conservation in general and to individual PAs and tiger reserves in particular, why treat those at the bottom of the hierarchy with such callousness? And that too for only their legitimate dues.
The lesson should be a simple one – if conservation is to be successful, things need to be in order, first, inside the home. Everything else can come later.


---
Protected Area Update
Vol. XVI, No. 1, February 2010 (No. 83)

Editor: Pankaj Sekhsaria
Editorial Assistance: Reshma Jathar
Illustrations: Madhuvanti Anantharajan
Produced by: Kalpavriksh

Ideas, comments, news and information may please be sent to the editorial address:

KALPAVRIKSH
Apartment 5, Shri Dutta Krupa, 908 Deccan Gymkhana, Pune 411004, Maharashtra, India.
Tel/Fax: 020 – 25654239.
Email: psekhsaria@gmail.com
Website: www.kalpavriksh.org

--
Publication of the PA Update has been supported by
- Foundation for Ecological Security (FES)
http://fes.org.in/
- Duleep Matthai Nature Conservation Trust
C/o FES
- Greenpeace India
www.greenpeace.org/india/
- Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
www.rspb.org.uk/
- Indian Bird Conservation Network
http://www.ibcn.in/
***
Information has been sourced from different newspapers and the following websites

http://wildlifewatch.in/
http://indiaenvironmentportal.org.in

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Islands in flux: 2004-2009

Dear Friends
Many of you will recollect, and also perhaps have read 'Troubled Islands', which was a compilation of my journalistic writings on the A&N from the period 1998 to 2003. (see the side bar for details of Troubled Islands)

I have in the subsequent years, continued to write on the various issues of the islands including those related to the indigenous communities and the impacts of the earthquake and tsunami of December 2004.

Over time there have been many requests from members on the group and otherwise for copies of these and older articles. Prompted by the requests and the interest I have just put together a set of another 14 articles in a basic photocopied compilation of 50 pages.

The issues covered include the earthquake and tsunami of 2004, the situation of the indigenous communities of the islands and some matters related to tourism.

The compilation is available for Rs. 70 (for photocopy, handling and postage). If any of you would like a copy of this compilation do please write to me. In case you are also interested in a copy of the older 'Troubled Islands' (Rs. 120) we will be able to optimise postage and other costs and send you the two together for Rs. 150.

best wishes
pankaj

Saturday, December 12, 2009

THE ISLANDS HAVE A MUCH DEEPER HISTORY

by Pankaj Sekhsaria

THE LIGHT OF ANDAMANS, Vol 34, Issue 20, December 11, 2009
http://www.lightofandaman.com/news5.asp

The recent call by the All India Forward Block (The Light of Andamans, Nov. 25, 2009) to rename the Andaman & Nicobar Islands as Shaheed and Swaraj is neither new nor unexpected. It has been around in the islands since the 1950s and more recently even others like historian Swati Dasgupta, for instance, have made the same call (‘Remembering Kaalapani’, The Times of India, May 7, 2005)

If these calls are heeded, these islands could well see a monumental shift in their present namescape. The island named after Sir Hugh Rose, the man who finally cornered Rani Laxmibai of Jhansi after the mutiny of 1857, could soon be named Laxmibai Dweep or maybe Rani Jhansi Dweep. Havelock Island named after the British General who re-took Lucknow from Nana Sahib could well be named Nana Sahib Dweep and the direct reference to the call by Subhas Chandra Bose is the most evoked one in any case.
The Rani of Jhansi or Nana Sahib may have known little of the islands (or even that they existed) but that surely is of little consequence.

This group of 500 odd islands scattered in an arc in the Bay of Bengal, are certainly fertile territory for a massive, even lip smacking renaming exercise – Tantya Tope, Mangal Pandey, Subhas Chandra Bose, Veer Savarkar…how about Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Nehru, Rajiv Gandhi….the list is endless; one’s imagination the only limitation and why not – reclamation of one’s history, after all, is believed to be one of the most important and effective tools of nation building.

There is one hitch however, a question that renaming enthusiasts might want to first consider – How does one reclaim what was never yours in the first place? The islands, located far away from mainland India can only be considered a gift that British left India with when the empire disintegrated. There are undeniable connections of India’s freedom movement with the islands; best symbolized by the mutiny of 1857 and the Cellular Jail. There can be no denying that and neither can one deny the close bonds that a large section of the country feels with these islands, but, and this is the crux of the argument here, all put together this history does not go beyond a 150 years. We might want to rename Havelock Island in the memory of Nana Sahib, but is it not worth asking whether the island that is today called Havelock had some earlier name too?

Let it not be forgotten, the Andaman and Nicobar Islands have been the traditional home of a number of aboriginal communities - the Great Andamanese, Jarawa, Onge and Sentinelese (in the Andamans), the Nicobaris and the Shompen (in the Nicobars) that have been living here for nearly 50,000 years. The 150 years that we want to claim now is like the blink of an eye in comparison. Injustices have been done and continue to be done to these communities in a manner that has few parallels in India. Their lands have been taken, their forests converted to plywood and agricultural plantations, and the fabric of their societies so violently torn apart that extinction looms on the horizon for many of them. The Great Andamanese who were at least 5000 individuals when the 1857 mutiny happened are today less than 40 people. The Onge who were counted at about 600 individuals in 1901 census are only a 100 people today. There are critical issues of survival that these communities are faced with – problems that are complex and will be difficult to resolve. If indeed there is energy and interest in doing something in the islands and for the islanders these are lines that we need to be thinking on.

These are people, like indigenous peoples everywhere, who have their own histories, their own societies, and yes, their own names for the islands and places. First the British called something else and now we want to call something else again. If indeed the places have to be renamed, should not an effort first be made to find out what the original people had first named them, why they were so named, what the significances were and which names are still in use by them. Should that not be the work of scholarship and historical studies? Why is that this is not a history that political parties want to correct? It would be a far more challenging and worthwhile exercise and perhaps not a very difficult one either because a lot of information does already exist.

If indeed the real and complete history of the islands is ever written, the British would not be more than a page and India could only be a paragraph. How’s that for a perspective and a context?

*Pankaj Sekhsaria is the author of Troubled Islands – Writings on the indigenous peoples and environment of the Andaman & Nicobar Islands